Mayor Mamdani proposes solutions to improve oversight of the NYPD.
In 2019, Lieutenant Jonathan Rivera of the New York Police Department (NYPD) found himself at the center of controversy following the fatal shooting of Allan Feliz during a traffic stop. This incident prompted a disciplinary trial initiated by the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB), which ultimately recommended Rivera’s termination. The recommendation was based on findings that confirmed Rivera’s violation of NYPD department guidelines. However, despite this internal ruling and the Deputy Commissioner of Trials’ recommendation, Rivera remains employed within the department due to an intervention by Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch. This decision raises serious questions about the integrity of internal disciplinary protocols and the accountability mechanisms within the NYPD.
The continuation of Rivera’s employment despite the CCRB’s recommendations has significantly undermined public trust in both the NYPD and the broader systems of police oversight in New York City. This situation underscores an urgent need for reform in police accountability measures. Civic leaders, including mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, are calling for actionable changes aimed at rebuilding this trust and enhancing the department’s relationship with the communities it serves.
One key reform proposed involves codifying NYPD guidelines for penalties associated with officer misconduct. By establishing a legal framework that mandates adherence to these guidelines—except in extraordinary circumstances—future police commissioners would be held accountable to specific disciplinary measures, reducing the potential for arbitrary decision-making that currently allows political pressures to influence outcomes. Previous administrations have taken steps in this direction, but recent policy shifts have rolled back these advances, leading to a situation where the revised disciplinary matrix reportedly lowers penalties for officers found to have violated rules.
Mamdani suggests that a second critical step would be ensuring that CCRB disciplinary findings are final unless extraordinary reasons dictate otherwise. Currently, when the CCRB recommends punitive measures such as termination based on its investigations, the NYPD often disregards these findings, creating a disconnect between police accountability mechanisms and community expectations for justice.
Moreover, timely appointments to the CCRB are essential for maintaining its effectiveness. Vacancies can stall proceedings and impede thorough investigations. To combat this problem, proposed measures would empower a majority of sitting CCRB board members to approve interim replacements if vacancies remain unfilled for over 90 days, ensuring the board functions optimally.
New York City’s approach to police oversight stands as a potential model for reform across the United States, but it requires significant investment in the CCRB’s capabilities and a commitment to enforce its findings. The current environment, wherein departmental penalties appear to be mere suggestions, allows for a culture of impunity among officers. A reformed disciplinary system would offer clarity to officers regarding expected conduct and ensure that instances of misconduct are addressed transparently and promptly.
Mayor Mamdani would have the opportunity to further these necessary reforms, fostering a safer environment for New Yorkers and addressing the pressing need for accountability. The stakes are high—not only for the families affected by police actions, such as the family of Allan Feliz, but also for the larger framework of public trust in law enforcement. Moving forward, systemic changes are essential to fortify the relationship between the NYPD and the communities it is sworn to protect.
Media News Source
