Former midshipman faces charges for threatening Naval Academy, incident resulted in a shooting.
A former midshipman has been arrested in connection with a false threat that led to a lockdown at the United States Naval Academy and resulted in a mistaken shooting incident. On September 11, 2023, Jackson Fleming, age 23, allegedly sent a threatening message that prompted a significant law enforcement response at the prestigious Annapolis, Maryland institution, as confirmed by the Justice Department.
According to investigators, Fleming utilized a false internet protocol (IP) address to create the impression that the threats originated from within the academy itself. However, authorities determined that Fleming had been expelled from the Naval Academy prior to the incident and was at his home in Chesterton, Indiana, at the time he sent the threats.
The lockdown triggered a wave of panic as rumors circulated regarding the presence of an active shooter on campus. These unfounded fears escalated when a midshipman struck a security officer entering a dormitory room with a parade rifle. In response, the officer discharged their firearm, inadvertently striking a student in the shoulder. The injured midshipman was promptly transported to a hospital and subsequently released the following day.
Fleming’s case is particularly notable given its timing. The threat was issued on the anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a date of heightened sensitivity in the United States. The day prior, an incident involving the shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University had further contributed to a climate of fear across educational institutions, as several universities implemented lockdown measures in response to varied threats.
Fleming’s attorney, Jonathan Bodi, has expressed an intention to vigorously contest the charges in court, asserting confidence that a comprehensive examination of the facts will clear his client’s name.
This incident has highlighted ongoing concerns about security on college and university campuses, as well as the implications of making false threats in an era characterized by heightened vigilance related to public safety. Law enforcement agencies continue to stress the importance of accuracy and responsibility in communication, especially in matters that can lead to significant disruptions and potential harm.
As the legal proceedings unfold, this case underscores the continued challenges faced by educational institutions in maintaining safety while navigating the complexities of threat assessment and response.
