Connecticut police apologize to man wrongfully arrested for allegedly driving 132 mph to a job interview.

Connecticut State Police have formally apologized to Azmir Djurkovic, a young man previously arrested for allegedly driving at speeds exceeding 130 mph, despite evidence showing he was at home at the time of the incident. This significant case has drawn attention due to its unusual circumstances, ultimately leading to the dismissal of all charges against Djurkovic.

On June 4, 2025, authorities initially reported that they had clocked a vehicle traveling at 132 mph on Interstate 91 in Cromwell. Subsequently, officers traced the car’s registration to Djurkovic, then 19 years old, leading to his arrest on multiple charges, including reckless endangerment and engaging police in a pursuit. Police claimed Djurkovic confessed to being late for a job interview when they apprehended him.

However, Djurkovic’s legal representatives at Carlson & Dumeer, LLC, contested these allegations, revealing inconsistencies between the vehicle in question and Djurkovic’s car. They successfully demonstrated that he was at home during the incident, effectively debunking the police’s claims. This revelation prompted the prosecutors to drop all charges against him.

In light of the unfolding events, Connecticut State Police Colonel Daniel Loughman publicly acknowledged errors in the investigation. His statement emphasized the distress caused to Djurkovic and his family while confirming that no further prosecution would occur. The Colonel expressed a commitment to reviewing the incident, stating that an internal affairs investigation would be initiated to determine whether proper protocols were followed and if corrective actions are necessary.

The unusual nature of this case has sparked widespread media coverage, with numerous national outlets reporting on the bizarre circumstances of the arrest and Djurkovic’s purported excuse for high-speed driving. According to statements from Djurkovic’s attorney, the young man never admitted to speeding during his interaction with police and clarified that he had not left his residence that day.

As the case begins to fade from public scrutiny, further developments related to the internal review by the Connecticut State Police may shed light on procedural lapses and lead to necessary reforms within the department. The incident raises important questions about accountability and transparency in law enforcement practices, particularly in high-stakes situations that significantly affect individuals’ lives.