Cuomo Campaign’s Ties to Lobbying Firm Allegedly Violate Rules, Investigation Requested by Advocacy Group
Common Cause, a prominent government reform organization, has filed a formal complaint with the New York City Campaign Finance Board, alleging potential violations of campaign finance laws by former Governor Andrew Cuomo’s campaign. The organization contends that services rendered by Tusk Strategies, a well-known lobbying firm, should be classified as in-kind contributions, which could violate stringent spending limits designated for candidates.
The complaint was submitted on Tuesday, as detailed by Susan Lerner, the executive director of Common Cause. It marks a significant contention point in Cuomo’s political campaign as the group asserts that these consulting and polling services go beyond permitted financial allowances set forth for candidate campaigns. This allegation arises in the wake of the Campaign Finance Board recently withholding approximately .3 million in public matching funds from Cuomo’s campaign due to suspected improper collaboration with a super PAC, further heightening scrutiny around his campaign finances.
Common Cause’s complaint emphasizes the belief that a thorough investigation will reveal the extent of violations committed by Cuomo’s campaign, culminating in a recommendation for the campaign to refund all previously received matching funds. The group also insists that Cuomo should be disqualified from receiving any future public financing, arguing that the persistence of the alleged infractions warrants such repercussions.
This issue came to light following reports by Politico indicating that Chris Coffey, the CEO of Tusk Strategies, had not been compensated for his extensive work related to the campaign. Additionally, concerns have arisen regarding Shontell Smith, Cuomo’s political campaign director, who is reportedly receiving payments from both the campaign and Tusk. These dual financial arrangements raise questions about potential violations of the Campaign Finance Board’s regulations, as they may undermine the intended spending limits.
Moreover, Common Cause referenced polling efforts funded by Tusk, with one poll conducted shortly before Cuomo announced his candidacy and another shortly thereafter. These polls were not disclosed to the Campaign Finance Board, leading Common Cause to believe they might infringe upon campaign finance regulations. The complaint underscores a possible lack of adequate reporting and accounting for these expenses in relation to Cuomo’s campaign spending cap.
In response, Cuomo’s spokesperson, Rich Azzopardi, characterized the allegations as an attempt at election interference. He asserted that New York voters are discerning enough not to be swayed by what he described as disingenuous tactics disguised as a commitment to good governance. He further remarked that it is common practice for political consultants to work with multiple clients and that individuals can engage in volunteer activities on campaigns without it being classified as a financial contribution.
As the situation develops, scrutiny surrounding Cuomo’s campaign financing continues to intensify, reflecting broader concerns about transparency and the integrity of the electoral process in New York City.
Media News Source.
