Denise Richards alleges ex-partner stole laptop with nude photos and claims there is video evidence of the incident.
Denise Richards, the star of “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills,” is embroiled in a contentious divorce from her estranged husband, Aaron Phypers. Recent developments in the case have revealed that Richards’ legal team alleges the existence of video evidence indicating that Phypers unlawfully took possession of a laptop containing sensitive material, including nude photographs of the reality television personality. This assertion was brought to light during a court hearing held on August 8, though Richards’ attorneys did not present the purported footage during the session.
Richards, 54, did not attend the court proceedings in person, while Phypers, 52, participated via Zoom. He filed for divorce on July 7, citing irreconcilable differences as the reason for their split. Following the divorce filing, Richards obtained a temporary restraining order against Phypers, claiming he subjected her to death threats and physical violence, including an incident in 2022 that resulted in a black eye. In a counter to these allegations, Phypers has asserted that Richards is attempting to divert attention away from her own alleged infidelity, which he claims he discovered earlier this year.
Furthermore, Richards has requested that the court restrict Phypers from accessing, distributing, or disclosing any content from her electronic devices. She claims that he has unlawfully leaked her private photographs and text messages to various media outlets, thereby violating the terms of the restraining order.
In a concerning turn of events, Richards was observed with visible injuries, including an apparent black eye and a cut on her chin, which sources suggest may have resulted from cosmetic procedures. However, details surrounding her visit to Phypers’ residence, where police were called after she attempted to collect her dogs, add another layer of complexity to the situation. Richards alleges that Phypers euthanized one of their dogs without her consent, a claim he vehemently disputes.
As legal proceedings continue, Richards and Phypers remain at the center of a highly publicized and distressing dispute that highlights the challenges of high-profile relationships, particularly when exacerbated by allegations of abuse and privacy violations. The divorce case not only underscores the personal struggles of the involved parties but also serves as a reminder of the intricate interplay between celebrity, media, and privacy in the modern age.
Media News Source
