Don Lemon suggests on a podcast that Megyn Kelly resembles a transgender woman.

In a recent episode of the “Clip Farmers” podcast, former CNN anchor Don Lemon and his co-hosts targeted Megyn Kelly, a prominent figure in conservative media, in a discussion that sparked controversy over personal appearance and gender expression. Lemon, who has faced scrutiny in the past for his comments regarding women, engaged in mocking remarks about Kelly, 54, during the podcast broadcast.

The discussion escalated when co-hosts John Cotter and Chris Miglioranzi used the term “chopped” to describe Kelly, implying that she was not attractive. When informed of the term’s connotation, Lemon, who is 59, agreed with the characterization. He elaborated on his perception of Kelly’s looks, referencing what he views as an excessive reliance on hairpieces and makeup, and critiqued the aesthetic commonly associated with her brand of conservatism, calling it a “MAGA look.”

Lemon further expressed disapproval of women in the conservative media sphere, suggesting they appear excessively thin, and infamously remarked that Kelly should “eat a cheeseburger.” His commentary took a more controversial turn when he accused Kelly of resembling a transgender woman, using the term “clockable,” which refers to individuals who can be identified as transgender.

The dialogue drew attention, as it highlights the often-contentious nature of media personalities engaging in public discourse involving gender identity and appearance. Kelly, who has not publicly addressed Lemon’s comments, has not responded to requests for comment regarding this instance.

The broader implications of Lemon’s remarks touch on societal standards of beauty and the often harsh judgment placed on public figures, particularly women. As discussions about gender identities and representation intensify in various sectors, incidents like this serve as important reminders of how public figures navigate their identities within the media landscape.

Critics of Lemon’s statements raise concerns over the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes and the implications of such commentary on public perceptions of gender variance and physical appearance. As the conversation continues, it underscores the need for thoughtful dialogue surrounding the interplay of media representation, personal identity, and societal expectations in an increasingly polarized environment.

The exchange between Lemon and Kelly illustrates the complex dynamics at play in contemporary media culture, where personal critiques often intersect with broader discussions about identity and inclusion.