Immigration officials associate tattoos with gang affiliation, but tattoo artists argue this connection is inaccurate.
In March, U.S. federal authorities deported 238 immigrants from a Texas prison back to El Salvador. Among those deported was Neri Alvarado, a Venezuelan asylum seeker who, despite having no criminal record, was flagged by immigration officials. They suspected him of being affiliated with the Tren de Aragua gang, citing his tattoo, which featured a vibrant ribbon with colorful puzzle pieces—a universally recognized emblem for autism—and the name of his brother, Neryelson, who is on the autism spectrum.
Luis Carlos Jose Marcano, another deportee, faced a similar predicament. The Venezuelan father was marked by immigration officials due to a crown tattoo on his chest, along with the phrase “One Life.” According to his family, Marcano received this tattoo over eight years ago in Venezuela in homage to a former girlfriend, who similarly bore a matching tattoo stating “One Love.”
These deportations have raised concerns among family members, advocates, and tattoo artists regarding the U.S. government’s methods of associating immigrants’ body art with gang affiliations. Many argue that the tattoos, which often symbolize love, faith, or personal significance, are mistakenly perceived as indicators of criminality.
Tren de Aragua, notorious for its links to forced labor, drug trafficking, and violence, has been labeled a foreign terrorist organization alongside other criminal groups. The Trump administration leveraged this classification to invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, facilitating quicker detainment and deportation of alleged gang members. However, artists and advocates maintain that tattoos do not provide reliable evidence of one’s association with criminal organizations.
Ronna Rísquez, a Venezuelan journalist and author, asserts that no Venezuelan gang uses specific tattoos as distinguishing markers of membership. She contends that tattoos primarily reflect personal expression and choice, rather than affiliation with crime. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has refrained from discussing the specifics of how tattoos are categorized due to law enforcement sensitivities, yet some documentation indicates that a point-based system is used to evaluate whether an individual is linked to Tren de Aragua.
Rísquez believes that the reliance on a tattoo catalog to link individuals to gangs reflects a lack of professionalism and oversight in law enforcement practices. Such lists often include symbols, phrases, and designs that lack substantial connections to criminal activity. This ambiguity raises valid concerns about oversimplifying complex cultural expressions and personal choices, which many immigrants use as markers of identity or sentiment.
Néstor Castillo, a tattoo artist in Tampa, acknowledges the evolving nature of body art, noting that popular designs once stereotyped as gang symbols are now embraced widely for their aesthetic appeal. Similarly, Pedro Jorge Ramirez, a Cuban immigrant, has multiple tattoos reflecting personal significance rather than criminal links. He expressed frustration over law enforcement’s tendencies to conflate innocuous tattoos with gang affiliation, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of body art.
As opposition to these practices grows, community advocates like Leo Gonzalez emphasize the pressing need for due process and fairness in immigration enforcement, stressing that targeting individuals for deeply personal tattoo choices can lead to unjust outcomes. The situation illustrates the intersection of immigration, personal expression, and law enforcement’s evolving interpretations of cultural symbols, highlighting the urgent necessity for reforms in how authorities address these complex issues.
Media News Source
