India’s Waqf Amendment Act Raises Concerns Over Bureaucratic Control and Property Management

Imagine a meticulously maintained bungalow, a century old and built by your great-grandfather, serving as a sanctuary of generosity and community service. For decades, its doors have welcomed those in need, embodying your family’s dedication to charitable work. This building represents not just bricks and mortar, but a legacy of compassion entrusted to you through generations.

Then, with unexpected swiftness, the landscape changes dramatically.

A new piece of legislation is enacted. A single government official, standing on a distant hill, surveys the grounds and declares, “That property, which has enriched lives for years, is no longer yours.” In that moment, the bungalow, long a beacon for goodwill, is reclassified as government property. The family’s guardianship is nullified, and the state assumes control. Suddenly, you find yourself unable to enter the dwelling entrusted to your care without government permission.

While this may sound dystopian to many, for Indian Muslims, it reflects the troubling reality under the Waqf Amendment Act of 2025. This legislation disrupts foundational principles of property ownership, due process, and religious neutrality, reshaping how assets meant for community welfare are managed.

Waqf, a term derived from Islamic tradition, designates a perpetual endowment to God, intended to benefit communities through services such as education and healthcare. Historically, this property has been safeguarded by a mutawalli, or custodian, with assumed protection from the state. However, the recent amendments turn this understanding on its head.

The revised law removes a crucial clause that previously allowed land to be designated as “waqf” based on its traditional charitable usage. Instead, the state has granted unilateral authority to a single government official to determine property classification, unencumbered by due process or evidentiary support. Such a shift raises concerns about equitable treatment and the efficacy of the appeals process.

Moreover, the legislation controversially mandates the inclusion of non-Muslims on Waqf Boards, a requirement not mirrored in other religious contexts. This demand prompts questions about the balance between inclusivity and the preservation of theological integrity.

The government now asserts the right to audit waqf properties, cloaked in claims of transparency. Yet this perceived oversight may appear biased and lacks the necessary checks and balances, potentially compromising the trust inherent in waqf management.

This situation represents a nuanced encroachment on community assets, masked by legislative authority rather than overt force. The bungalow stands unchanged physically, but the intent behind its existence is increasingly subject to state discretion.

In this landscape, we observe not just a challenge to religious trusts, but a broader issue of asset appropriation — a trend driven by policy rather than property disputes. This predicament transcends religious differences, fundamentally intertwining the fate of communal belonging with real estate dynamics ripe for potential exploitation.

The evolving narrative demands attention, as it implicates significant socio-political questions surrounding individual rights and community autonomy within the mosaic of India’s diverse culture.

#PoliticsNews #MiddleEastNews