Irvine collaborates with local agencies to address radioactive waste issues at San Onofre.
In the ongoing discussion regarding the relocation of radioactive waste from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Plant, the Irvine City Council finds itself at a crossroads. This situation arises as the site, located on the northern edge of Camp Pendleton, continues to store approximately 3.6 million pounds of spent nuclear fuel within stainless-steel canisters, which have remained longer than initially anticipated. The plant was officially decommissioned in 2013 following the discovery of faulty steam generators, a process that has left a considerable byproduct of nuclear waste waiting for a permanent disposal solution.
As of 2025, the federal government has not yet identified a permanent location for this waste. The proximity of the site—just 25 minutes from Irvine and within a 50-mile radius of about 8 million residents—has intensified calls for action. Recent discussions have indicated that there is interest in relocating the waste to higher ground within Camp Pendleton, specifically east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, until a permanent federal solution is reached.
In late September, Mayor Larry Agran convened a special study session to address the delays associated with the waste’s removal. Agran suggested that the city explore local solutions, possibly positioning Irvine as a key player in the ongoing efforts. Shortly thereafter, the council voted in favor of joining the Spent Fuel Solutions Coalition, a consortium of various local governments and organizations advocating for the relocation of San Onofre’s nuclear waste to federally licensed facilities. However, Agran and Councilmember Mike Carroll voiced their desire for Irvine to assume a more proactive role in these initiatives.
Councilmember Kathleen Treseder expressed her concerns regarding on-site storage, emphasizing the importance of collaboration with experts from Congressman Mike Levin’s Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Force. While underscoring her commitment to supporting the coalition’s efforts, she also expressed hesitance toward allocating city funds for relocation, citing potential astronomical costs.
Agran’s proposal to assemble a city-led team of experts aimed at devising a strategic plan for the waste’s relocation garnered interest among the council. His proposition included developing a timeline and financial framework for the initiative. Other council members highlighted the need for thorough consideration of costs versus community needs, questioning whether these actions would meaningfully improve safety for Irvine families.
In a concerted effort to address the issue, council members also affirmed their commitment to engage Congress members in support of the bipartisan Spent Nuclear Fuel Solutions Caucus, aiming to advocate for the safe removal of spent nuclear fuel in cooperation with ongoing local and national efforts. The council’s decisions will likely shape Irvine’s role in the future of nuclear waste management and its impact on community safety.
