Juror removed from Diddy’s NYC sex trafficking trial due to inconsistencies regarding his residence.

A Manhattan federal judge overseeing the high-profile sex trafficking trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs dismissed a juror on Monday due to concerns over a lack of transparency regarding his living situation. During the jury selection process, Juror No. 6 claimed to reside in the Bronx. However, during a casual conversation with a court security officer, he mentioned having moved in with his girlfriend in New Jersey. The discrepancies were brought to the court’s attention by prosecutors, prompting a review of the juror’s statements.

Judge Arun Subramanian expressed skepticism about the juror’s explanations when questioned about the inconsistencies. He noted that the juror’s attempts to clarify his situation during a break included conflicting claims about spending four to five nights each week in his New York apartment, suggesting a substantial ambiguity that compromised the integrity of the jury.

In defense of the juror, Combs’ legal team argued against his dismissal, alleging that the prosecution was seeking to remove him based on racial bias. Judge Subramanian firmly rejected this argument, emphasizing that there has been no evidence of biased conduct from the prosecution throughout the proceedings.

The juror’s position on the jury was subsequently filled by an alternate juror, a white male, signaling a significant moment in the ongoing trial.

The case against Combs, now 55 years old, continues to unfold, with federal prosecutors nearing the conclusion of their arguments. He faces multiple serious charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transporting individuals for prostitution. If convicted, Combs could face decades in prison, although he has pleaded not guilty to all allegations.

According to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office, Combs is accused of perpetrating a series of crimes against vulnerable women under the guise of his larger-than-life celebrity persona. Prosecutors allege that he coerced these individuals into participating in extended sexual parties known as “freak-offs,” while also employing members of a criminal enterprise to enforce compliance through intimidation.

Testimonies presented in court have included accounts from women who allege they were sexually exploited, as well as former staff members who claimed to have facilitated drug transportation and prepared locations for the alleged illicit activities. Evidence has emerged, linking Combs to severe threats, violence, and efforts to suppress incriminating evidence connected to his actions over the years.

This developing trial continues to attract significant public and media interest, particularly concerning the serious allegations leveled against a figure as prominent as Sean Combs.

Media News Source will continue to provide updates as this case progresses.