Marjorie Taylor Greene claims that a group is manipulating the weather during a recent speech.

In recent discussions surrounding climate manipulation, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has made headlines with assertions about government-controlled weather patterns. Utilizing the social media platform X, Greene expressed her belief that an unspecified entity is actively manipulating the weather, a notion she suggests is now being acknowledged by officials who claim that these actions pose no harm.

Greene’s rhetoric echoes the sentiments of other conspiracy theorists who have previously suggested bizarre explanations for natural disasters, including one controversial claim involving space lasers attributed to financiers of Jewish descent, which she alleged were responsible for California wildfires. In her recent posts, Greene employs the term “they” to reference an ambiguous “deep state” she accuses of covertly influencing the environment.

Despite lacking substantial evidence to support her claims, Greene stated her intent to champion legislation aimed at banning weather modification and geoengineering. During her outburst, she condemned alleged government entities and private companies profiting from such practices, yet details of the supposed manipulations remain vague and unsupported by scientific consensus.

The Congresswoman further emphasized her position by asserting that citizens are not “lab rats” and declared that weather should not be considered a controlled environment. Her views have continued to gain attention, particularly in light of recent severe weather events, such as the catastrophic flooding in Texas that resulted in over 120 fatalities.

In response to rising public concern and speculation regarding geoengineering practices, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin released a statement addressing the anxieties of many Americans. He indicated that the EPA is committed to thoroughly exploring the implications of geoengineering activities. Concurrently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) clarified that the United States is still in the early stages of developing capabilities to monitor solar geoengineering efforts, indicating that readiness is likely years away.

Such discussions about weather manipulation often intensify following meteorological disasters, underscoring a troubling trend of misinformation proliferating on social media platforms. As lawmakers like Greene continue to voice unsubstantiated theories, the need for clear and factual information regarding environmental policies and weather-related phenomena grows increasingly urgent.

As the debate over climate interventions evolves, the intersection of scientific inquiry and public discourse exemplifies a critical juncture in the broader conversation about environmental stewardship and accountability. Media News Source.