Mehmet Oz states Trump’s Medicaid changes will increase workforce participation, despite many current recipients already being employed in Atlantic City.

In a recent visit to AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center in Atlantic City, Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, defended the newly passed legislation that significantly alters Medicaid. This law, often referred to as President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” has been a source of contention, particularly among advocates for low-income individuals. Critics contend that it will lead to the removal of millions from Medicaid, a claim that Oz has sought to refute by emphasizing the legislation’s goal of increasing workforce participation.

During the interview, Oz asserted that his principal concern is to prevent individuals from being unintentionally displaced from the Medicaid system. He emphasized that the reforms are designed not to penalize those in need but to encourage able-bodied individuals to seek employment. His comments echo a growing sentiment among some policymakers that Medicaid has become inefficiently burdened by “waste, fraud, and abuse,” a perspective that has faced pushback from policy experts who question the evidence supporting such claims.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, estimates indicate that around 8 million individuals could potentially lose their Medicaid coverage as a direct result of the changes instated by the new legislation. While Oz did not address this projection specifically, he stated that incentives in the new federal regulations would motivate people to return to work rather than disengage from the workforce.

Despite claims from Oz regarding workforce participation, data from the Kaiser Family Foundation indicates that 92% of non-disabled adults under 65 who rely on Medicaid are already engaged in work, caregiving, education, or managing health issues. This raises questions about the necessity of instigating work requirements for a population that is largely already employed or otherwise occupied.

Judith Levine, director of Temple University’s Public Policy Lab, criticized the prevailing narrative of Medicaid fraud, suggesting that such rhetoric serves as a distraction from the real conversation about maintaining essential services for vulnerable populations. She argued that this ongoing focus on alleged abuses is often exploited to justify cuts to a system that millions rely on for basic healthcare.

In conclusion, as Dr. Oz embarks on his role as a federal administrator, he faces the challenging task of balancing Medicaid reform with the preservation of its original intent: to support those in need. His engagement with local politicians and health professionals suggests a commitment to dialogue on this pivotal issue, which has significant implications for public health policy in the United States.

Media News Source