Nepal’s internet restrictions reflect a worldwide trend in increasing suppression of online freedoms.
In recent developments, Nepal’s government has initiated a crackdown on social media platforms, leading to protests that have resulted in the tragic loss of at least 19 lives. This action is emblematic of a broader global decline in internet freedoms, where even democratic nations have sought to suppress online expression. The government announced last week that it would block popular platforms such as Facebook, X, and YouTube, citing these companies’ failure to register with the government as the primary reason for its actions. A day after the violent protests, the government lifted the ban.
Experts note that Nepal’s measures reflect a global trend towards narrative control, a tactic increasingly employed by governments in the region, including India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. According to analysts, the call for social media companies to appoint local liaisons and comply with stringent regulations emphasizes a growing desire for oversight. However, critics argue that such moves serve more as mechanisms for censorship than regulatory measures intended for user safety and accountability.
The assertion that governments have a legitimate interest in regulating social media is not entirely unfounded. Authorities often seek to mitigate misinformation and protect digital users. However, as highlighted by researchers, blanket bans like those seen in Nepal disproportionately harm millions, effectively cutting them off from platforms essential for communication, business, education, and healthcare information.
The pattern of declining internet freedoms is not isolated to Nepal. Freedom House’s recent report indicates a global decline in internet freedoms for the fourteenth consecutive year. Nations like China, Myanmar, and India have enacted laws that grant extensive powers to authorities to monitor and restrict online communications. India’s 2023 telecommunications law has been noted for enabling far-reaching controls over digital expression, while recent legislation in Pakistan has empowered the government to penalize users for disseminating disinformation.
Calling internet freedom a “pillar of modern democracy,” analysts argue that a functional democracy requires an environment where individuals can freely express themselves and access diverse information sources. Unfortunately, many governments justify restrictive regulations under the premise of societal protection, deterring freedoms in the name of safety, particularly concerning child protection and cybersecurity.
In light of the internet shutdown in Nepal, there has been a notable increase in the use of virtual private networks (VPNs), with sign-ups for some services reportedly surging by 8,000%. While VPNs offer a potential workaround for circumventing censorship, experts caution that these solutions may not be accessible to all and often come with significant drawbacks, such as slower internet speeds and higher costs.
As governments continue to impose restrictive measures, the implications for civil liberties are significant, raising concerns about the future of free expression and access to information globally. The ongoing situation in Nepal serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between regulatory oversight and the preservation of fundamental rights in the digital age.
Media News Source
