NY Attorney General Letitia James supports efforts to halt student deportations related to Trump administration policies.
In a significant legal maneuver, New York Attorney General Letitia James, alongside 18 other attorneys general, has voiced strong opposition to recent actions taken by the Trump administration that threaten the deportation of international students. This collective stance comes in support of a lawsuit initiated by professors who seek to challenge the federal government’s immigration enforcement strategies.
In a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to a federal courtroom, the coalition of state attorneys general has accused the federal government of using immigration measures as a means of suppressing dissent and curtailing academic freedom. The plaintiffs argue that the enforcement actions disproportionately target individuals engaged in pro-Palestinian protests. They urge the judicial system to intervene and prevent arrests and deportations arising from these protests.
The lawsuit, which was filed in Massachusetts federal court on March 25, 2025, by faculty groups including the New York University chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), alleges that the revocation of student visas is contributing to a climate of fear on college campuses. This situation, they contend, hinders robust discourse and impedes the academic exploration of controversial issues. The Knight Institute, a free speech advocacy group at Columbia University, is actively involved in supporting this legal challenge.
In a related development, a brief was submitted by a coalition of 86 colleges and academic associations, including prominent institutions such as Fordham University, in defense of the AAUP’s position. Notably, this group also encompasses smaller liberal arts colleges that typically rely less on federal research funding.
As articulated by Attorney General James, the actions of the Trump administration represent a disturbing infringement upon First Amendment rights. The coalition emphasizes that these policies not only disrupt the educational environment but also present dire consequences for state economies and individual students. They highlight that the specter of deportation would deter both students and faculty from engaging in vigorous academic debate and inquiry.
Furthermore, the brief documents a marked decline in international student applications and enrollments within the State University of New York system, exacerbating concerns about the long-term effects of these policies on the academic landscape. Recent reports indicated that 21 international students from SUNY faced visa revocations, which could lead to immediate deportation. Consequently, many remaining students are opting out of professional opportunities and research funding due to fears of similar ramifications.
This chilling effect, the attorneys general assert, undermines their states’ ability to attract global talent and hampers economic growth by impacting tax revenues and job creation. As the situation evolves, administrators from various universities, including Columbia and NYU, are increasingly raising alarms regarding visa revocations initiated without prior notification to the institutions themselves.
As this issue unfolds, it stands as a poignant reminder of the complex interplay between immigration policy, academic freedom, and free speech rights, raising important questions about the future of higher education in the United States. The U.S. State Department has yet to provide commentary regarding these legal developments.
Media News Source
