Two Camden Housing Authority employees awarded .7 million in wrongful termination lawsuit.

In a significant ruling, a federal jury awarded Gary Evangelista and Kaberia Fussell, former employees of the Camden Housing Authority, a combined sum of .7 million after they were allegedly terminated for reporting instances of misconduct within the agency. The lawsuit, filed by Evangelista and Fussell in the aftermath of their dismissals, highlights serious concerns regarding the management practices and ethical standards of the housing authority.

The legal dispute began when a document surfaced indicating that a tenant owed ,000 in unpaid rent. This discrepancy prompted Evangelista, a retired police officer who managed security for the authority, to question why the tenant had not been evicted per agency policy but had instead been transferred to another unit. Acting on his concerns, Evangelista, along with colleague Fussell, reported various allegations, which included theft, fraud, and favoritism, to senior management.

However, rather than investigating these concerns, the housing authority chose to terminate both employees in December 2018. In response, Evangelista and Fussell argued in federal court that their dismissals violated their First Amendment rights by suppressing their freedom of speech regarding the irregularities they observed.

The jury’s ruling, delivered after a five-year legal battle, has raised questions about accountability and transparency within public housing agencies. While the verdict was favorable for Evangelista and Fussell, it remains uncertain whether the Camden Housing Authority and its three officials—former executive director Victor Figueroa, former deputy executive director Katheryn Blackshear, and board chairwoman Debbie Person-Polk—will appeal the decision. The agency has not responded to inquiries regarding potential appeals or the jury’s findings.

Following their termination, Evangelista experienced significant challenges in securing stable employment, and he characterized the jury’s decision as a transformative moment, stating it allowed him to reclaim his life after a prolonged period of distress. Fussell, who is part of a union, managed to appeal her firing successfully and returned to her role within the agency. She expressed feelings of vindication following the jury’s ruling, acknowledging the stigma often associated with being fired.

The lawsuit brought to light not only the alleged misconduct at the Camden Housing Authority but also illustrates broader issues related to employee protections and whistleblower policies in public agencies. The outcome underscores the complexities faced by employees who choose to speak out against perceived wrongdoing within their organizations, calling for a more robust framework for addressing and investigating such concerns in the future.

As this story develops, it may serve as a catalyst for increased scrutiny and reform within public housing authorities, ensuring that ethical standards are maintained and that employees can report misconduct without fear of retaliation.

Media News Source