USAID’s Involvement in Palestine’s Peacekeeping Efforts
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) established its office in Palestine in 1994, heralding a commitment to enhancing the lives of Palestinians. The agency’s former website once proudly reported that it had “helped four million Palestinians lead healthier and more productive lives.” However, in light of recent developments, including the agency’s closure under the administration of former U.S. President Donald Trump, it is essential to assess the impact and efficacy of USAID’s initiatives in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The termination of this agency’s operations significantly affected those who benefited from its funding, particularly in education and healthcare. Humanitarian efforts were disrupted, with the World Food Programme, one of the primary actors in the sector, experiencing considerable setbacks. Although the immediate consequences are clear, the broader implications of USAID and American funding necessitate examination within the complex political landscape shaped by the Israeli occupation.
As a researcher involved in evaluating USAID-funded programs, I observed various initiatives that, rather than alleviating hardship, often maintained the status quo of occupation. The establishment of USAID’s office coincided with the Oslo Accords—a significant but ultimately unfulfilled promise for Palestinian statehood, which was to be realized through peace negotiations ostensibly led by the U.S. Yet, the reality revealed a contrasting picture, wherein the Israeli state continued its expansion into occupied territories.
The official Palestinian leadership envisioned the Palestinian Authority (PA) as a transitional body that would administer civic functions until sovereignty was achieved. However, the PA was structured to serve U.S. interests, operating as a framework to manage the Palestinian populace. This arrangement necessitated cooperation with Israeli security forces, undermining potential resistance efforts and promoting a narrative of stability over liberation.
Between 1994 and 2018, USAID allocated over .2 billion in aid to various projects—including health, infrastructure, and education—intended to bolster public support for peace. However, a significant portion of this funding was directed to initiatives attempting to normalize relations between Palestinians and Israelis, overlooking the realities of ongoing occupation and apartheid.
One initiative I studied, the Conflict Management and Mitigation (CMM) Program, allocated substantial funding to foster cooperation between Palestinian and Israeli communities. Yet, many participants reported that the underlying issues, such as land and water access restrictions imposed by occupying forces, remained unaddressed. This funding dynamic highlights the complexities of conflict resolution efforts that often prioritize superficial interactions over substantive change.
Moreover, programs like Seeds of Peace aimed at uniting youth from conflict regions through dialogue and training, but the participant selection process often favored individuals from influential or affluent families. This reality raises questions regarding the inclusivity of such initiatives and their alignment with the aspirations of the broader Palestinian populace.
USAID’s endeavors, while well-intentioned, have often intersected with political agendas that prioritize U.S. interests over genuinely supporting Palestinian self-determination. The implications of this approach extend to funding allocations that inadvertently bolster those aligned with U.S. policies, such as the PA and its affiliates.
As USAID ceases operations, the potential for Palestinian civil society to explore new narratives and strategies emerges. This situation invites a reevaluation of how to engage with international donors and whether their assistance genuinely serves the needs of Palestinian society. In light of historical patterns where financial support did not foster meaningful progress, there lies an opportunity to cultivate a new, independent approach that empowers Palestinians in their pursuit of self-determination.
#PoliticsNews #MiddleEastNews
