Pa. Supreme Court reprimands lawyer while Philadelphia Democrats support his nomination for a judgeship.
Shawn K. Page, an attorney seeking a seat on the Philadelphia Municipal Court, has recently encountered significant scrutiny related to his professional conduct and personal financial matters. In 2021, he received a public reprimand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s disciplinary board due to inadequate handling of a client’s case. This year, Page was rated “not recommended” by the Philadelphia Bar Association when evaluated for his judicial candidacy.
In addition to these concerns, Page has faced a series of tax-related legal actions over the last two years, specifically liens totaling approximately 0,000 for unpaid federal income taxes and penalties. Page asserts that he is currently in a payment plan with the Internal Revenue Service and has successfully reduced his outstanding balance.
Despite these issues, Page has a strong backing from influential Democratic ward leaders, who frequently play a pivotal role in judicial elections in Philadelphia. The upcoming Democratic primary on May 20 will determine three open seats on the Municipal Court. Given Philadelphia’s predominantly Democratic electorate, the primary winners are almost assured of victory in the November elections.
Page is one of four Democratic candidates competing for these vital judicial positions, which handle various low-level cases, from minor criminal offenses to landlord-tenant issues. The annual salary for a Municipal Court judge is 2,000. Alongside Page, candidates Cortez Patton, Amanda Davidson, and Sherrie Cohen are also in the race, with Patton and Davidson receiving the party’s endorsement.
The endorsement process within the Democratic Party often involves candidates providing legal assistance to politically active individuals and their wards, a practice that enhances their visibility and support in the community. Page has engaged in this strategy, showcasing his legal skills and commitment to serving local leaders.
Page, 52, emphasizes his everyday background and connection to the community, stating that he does not portray himself as a perfect candidate but rather as a committed attorney. He aims to present himself to voters as relatable and accessible.
However, Page’s past has raised concerns among some observers, particularly regarding a 2018 case where he mishandled an appeal for a client accused of drug offenses. The disciplinary board found that he failed to provide competent representation, a situation exacerbated by his retention of the client’s payment without delivering adequate services.
The scrutiny surrounding Page’s candidacy reflects broader concerns about candidate qualifications for judicial appointments in Philadelphia. As he moves forward in his campaign, Page is focused on overcoming past hurdles and emphasizing his legal capabilities to secure a position on the Municipal Court bench. The upcoming primary could significantly influence his political future, and Page remains committed to proving his merit to both party leaders and voters.
He continues to assert his qualifications, stating his legal experience and community involvement while navigating the complexities of his professional history. The upcoming weeks will provide critical insights into how these factors will play out in the election process.
Media News Source
