Broadway adaptation of ‘Smash’ misses key elements that contributed to the TV show’s cult following.

In the recent adaptation of “Smash,” the Broadway musical inspired by the 2012 NBC series about the tumultuous creation of a show centered on Marilyn Monroe, audiences have been met with a stark contrast to the original’s engaging charm. While the TV series was noted for its witty commentary on the Broadway industry’s quirks and personality clashes, the live adaptation, which debuted at the Imperial Theatre, falls short of expectations, particularly given the level of talent involved.

The original narrative of “Smash” offered viewers a satirical look at the behind-the-scenes drama of musical theater, featuring characters rich with complexity and a storyline that cleverly subverted Broadway expectations. The series became notorious for its depiction of fraught relationships among artistic collaborators, ultimately evolving into something of a cult favorite. However, as fans shifted from viewing the show as a guilty pleasure to a subject of critique, the live staging has found itself lacking the same insights and surprises that marked its predecessor.

The new book, penned by Bob Martin and Rick Elice, retains elements of the original plot, focusing on the making of “Marilyn the Musical.” It introduces a range of characters including a beleaguered producer and a creative team embroiled in conflict. Yet where the show once spotlighted the competition between Ivy Lynn and Karen for the leading role, this adaptation positions Ivy as the established star, with Karen relegated to an understudy. A new character, associate director Chloe, appears to inject more rivalry into the mix. The primary tension, however, is internal, as Ivy grapples with the pressures of her role, aided and hindered by a method acting coach.

Despite the familiar faces and musical numbers, the production struggles to find its footing. Characters lean into familiar archetypes rather than evolving into compelling figures. The assistant character is transformed into a social media intern, diluting the sharp satire that once marked early portrayals in the series. This compromise leaves the production in a confusing limbo — it cannot decide whether to explore familiar territory or to chart new ground.

While standout performances from cast members, particularly in the signature number “Let Me Be Your Star,” provide some entertainment, they are overshadowed by a lack of coherence and engagement. The choreography, designed to be exhilarating, falls into a monotonous series of vignettes that keep audiences at arm’s length from the show’s essence.

Moreover, the original’s ability to critique the industry has been muddied by modern sensibilities regarding representation and stereotype. The adaptation attempts to balance nostalgia with contemporary ethics, creating a narrative that feels overly cautious and self-aware yet devoid of the sharp wit that characterized the series.

In conclusion, the live adaptation of “Smash” seems to be caught in a quandary, unable to present a fresh perspective or fully embrace the charm and critique of its source material. As it currently stands, the show lacks the vibrancy and innovation that made the original a noteworthy entry in television history. For die-hard fans, this production runs the risk of feeling like a retread rather than an inspired reimagining, leaving much to be desired in an industry that thrives on reinvention. Media News Source.