Statue of former owners removed from Riverside’s Mission Inn following completion of property sale.
The Mission Inn in Riverside, a historic landmark renowned for its architectural significance and cultural heritage, has recently undergone notable changes that have sparked considerable public debate. On May 20, the statue of Duane and Kelly Roberts, the previous owners of the hotel, was removed from the lobby, just hours after the controversial removal of two significant paintings. This statue, a gift to Duane Roberts for his 85th birthday, had been positioned at the main entrance since 2022 and was seen by some as a personal touch by the owners. However, critics deemed its presence self-indulgent, and its removal has reportedly received widespread approval on social media platforms.
The transition comes seven months after Duane Roberts’ passing and follows the completion of the sale of the Mission Inn to the Yuhaaviatam of the San Manuel Nation, finalized on May 29. The tribe has expressed its commitment to preserving the hotel’s historic integrity, a sentiment echoed by Lynn Valbuena, the tribe’s chairperson. This shift marks a significant departure from the Roberts family’s influence, with their names and likenesses appearing to be systematically erased from the establishment. Establishment names have been altered, such as “Kelly’s Spa” now becoming “Spa” and “Duane’s Steakhouse” transforming into “Mission Inn Steakhouse.”
The rebranding and departure of notable artifacts extend beyond the statue. On the same day as the statue’s removal, two paintings—“Charge Up San Juan Hill” and “California Alps”—were taken down, drawing public ire. These paintings, integral to the hotel’s legacy and purchased in the 1910s by founder Frank Miller, had been part of the hotel’s identity for over a century. Reports indicate that Kelly Roberts asserted the paintings were her personal property and thus excluded from the sale agreement.
The controversy raises serious questions about the ownership and preservation of cultural heritage within private establishments that serve public interest. The removal of these paintings has prompted discussions regarding past agreements that classified them as protected artifacts. Community members, including officials from local preservation groups, are advocating for further investigation into the matter. The sentiment among Riverside residents is palpable, as many feel a deep connection to the Mission Inn and are concerned about its evolving identity.
In conclusion, the recent developments at the Mission Inn highlight the complexities involved in balancing private ownership with community heritage. As the hotel transitions into new management, the challenge remains to honor its rich history while accommodating the visions of its new proprietors. The consequences of these changes will likely reverberate throughout the Riverside community for years to come.
